Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: What magnification is best for a budding honer?

  1. #1
    Junior Member singlebarrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Louisville, Ky
    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default What magnification is best for a budding honer?

    I am getting ready to start honing. Will a pocket 30X lit microscope give me enough mag to see the edge, or should I invest in something with alittle more juice? I would prefer something handheld. What are some reputable brands and models? Thanks for any feedback!

  2. #2
    Senior Member janivar123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Porsgrunn Norway
    Posts
    884
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 171 Times in 156 Posts

    Default

    Handheld i would go for a loupe much less hassle

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to janivar123 For This Useful Post:

    singlebarrel (12-20-2010)

  4. #3
    Scutarius Fbones24's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Freeport, NY
    Posts
    1,349
    Thanks
    260
    Thanked 1,452 Times in 277 Posts

    Default

    I am a "budding" honer as well and while I have a 30x loupe, I find myself never using it. I have been going on feel and the other sharpness tests and getting very good results.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Fbones24 For This Useful Post:

    singlebarrel (12-20-2010)

  6. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    593
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked 119 Times in 99 Posts

    Default

    Get a good quality hand held 10X loupe. Good quality being the key words, most of those 10-30x loupes 15$ and under are 7x at most. The best cheap loupes are belomo and bausch and lomb. I just got a belomo 10x to try out and really like it. Got it from geo-tools.com, it was 27$ if I remember right.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Pete_S For This Useful Post:

    singlebarrel (12-20-2010)

  8. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    963
    Thanks
    222
    Thanked 193 Times in 183 Posts

    Default

    +1. A triplet (3-lens) 10x loupe has a flat field and no color fringeing. I'm using one I bought when my wife and I were learning about diamonds.

    Google "diamond triplet loupe" -- something like this will work fine:

    Diamond Loupe - Loupe, Jewelers loupe, jewelry loupe, gem loupe, triplet loupe, gemological loupe, rosenthal, jewelers toy store

    It won't give you enough magnification to see the edge roughness after an 8K hone. But it's exactly right for checking for edge nicks, compound bevels, etc. And you can watch 2000-grit scratches disappear, and see the polishing effects of pastes.

    Charles

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to cpcohen1945 For This Useful Post:

    singlebarrel (12-20-2010)

  10. #6
    They call me Mr Bear. Stubear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    5,642
    Thanks
    1,578
    Thanked 1,646 Times in 1,336 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Another +1 for the 30x jewellers loupe here. Very handy!

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Stubear For This Useful Post:

    singlebarrel (12-20-2010)

  12. #7
    Still Stone Crazy After All :-( JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    18,093
    Thanks
    2,124
    Thanked 6,733 Times in 4,070 Posts

    Default

    I use this 30x here with good results. I also have an old B&L stereoscope that is at 45x. I've tried the hand held microscopes that go to 100x or so and find them to be a PITA. Some guys have scopes that go to 300x and more. I've found that if I keep my magnification limited to 45x my honing improves quite a bit.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to JimmyHAD For This Useful Post:

    singlebarrel (12-20-2010)

  14. #8
    v/r Glen gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Sandpoint, Idaho
    Posts
    14,757
    Thanks
    4,615
    Thanked 7,036 Times in 3,778 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    +1 I have a 40x loupe, but if it were to break I would buy a good quality 30x...

    Jimmy is quite right in his joke too, pretty much if you can't see it at 30-40x you can't feel it on your face anyway...

    That said I am after one of those USB microscopes next but just for fun, not for honing...

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:

    singlebarrel (12-20-2010)

  16. #9
    Forum mogwai thebigspendur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    14,937
    Thanks
    236
    Thanked 2,313 Times in 1,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    If you buy a quality piece you can see more at 20-30x than a lessor one at 100x or more. I've found for the work on razors around 20x shows me all I need to see and to tell you the truth with top of the line quality optics 10x does the job.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to thebigspendur For This Useful Post:

    singlebarrel (12-20-2010)

  18. #10
    Still Stone Crazy After All :-( JimmyHAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    18,093
    Thanks
    2,124
    Thanked 6,733 Times in 4,070 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thebigspendur View Post
    If you buy a quality piece you can see more at 20-30x than a lessor one at 100x or more. I've found for the work on razors around 20x shows me all I need to see and to tell you the truth with top of the line quality optics 10x does the job.
    Proof of that can be found if you read up on spotting scopes for long range rifle shooting. The quality of the lenses is far more important than the power.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to JimmyHAD For This Useful Post:

    singlebarrel (12-20-2010)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •